Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

The Bone & Joint Journal provides the latest evidence to guide the clinical practice of orthopaedic surgeons. The benefits of one intervention compared with another are presented using outcome measures; some may be specific to a limb or joint and some are more general health-related quality of life measures. Readers will be familiar with many of these outcome measures and will be able to judge the relative benefits of different interventions when measured using the same outcome tool; for example, different treatments for pain in the knee measured using a particular knee score. But, how should readers compare outcomes between different clinical areas using different outcome measures? This article explores the use of standardised effect sizes.

Original publication

DOI

10.1302/0301-620X.96B7.34109

Type

Journal article

Journal

Bone Joint J

Publication Date

07/2014

Volume

96-B

Pages

853 - 854

Keywords

Effect sizes, Hip Joint, Humans, Orthopedic Procedures, Orthopedics, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Quality of Life, Shoulder Joint